The purpose of the presentations is to encourage dialogue regarding particular texts and their contexts and to display student research and interpretations as an integral aspect of our course. The different tasks included in the presentations demonstrate the wide variety of valuable literary responses.
You will be divided into groups of 4 or 5 and asked to select a particular
text on which to make a presentation. The presentation itself should last
about half an hour and include the following three components:
|
|
|
|
| Develop a creative response to your selected text that can be presented to the class. | Present an analysis of the significance of all or part of your text. | Present contextual information located through research. |
| Ideas: Song, story, poem, play or acted scene, dance, essay, drawing, painting, collage, sculpture, photograph(s), model (of a scene or building), costume design, food, etc. | Ideas: Explain the significance of one theme, character, setting, image, poetic technique, etc. What does it mean to the rest of the text? What does it mean to you personally? What effect does it have on the reader? | Include a few significant aspects of the following:
|
|
|
|
Requirements:
The presentation is worth 30% of your course grade. Grades will not be calculated until electronic self-evaluations from all group members are received. Presentation evaluations will focus on the depth and usefulness of information and analysis, the effort put into the creative aspect, the organization and clarity of the presentation, the ability to guide activities and field questions, and the equal distribution of responsibility during the presentation. All group members will receive the same grade unless circumstances warrant otherwise. If possible, such divergences will be discussed with group members before the grades are assigned.
Rubric:
| 30 | 25.5 | 22.5 | 19.5 | 16.5 | |
| Usefulness of research information | Very useful, connected to analysis | Useful, somewhat connected to analysis | Adequate research presented but may not be connected to analysis | Little research presented | No research presented |
| Depth of text analysis | Analysis of text by group and/or class dealt connected the wording to an interpretation in interesting ways | Analysis of text by group and/or class connected the wording to an interpretation | Some analysis of text | Little analysis of text | No analysis of text |
| Effort/approrpriateness of creative aspect | Creative aspect seemed to take some effort and was interesting and relevant to the discussion | Creative aspect seemed to take some effort | Creative aspect was part of presentation | Little creative aspect or point unclear | No creative aspect |
| Organization of material | Sections of the presentation were presented in a logical order (e.g. background information prior to analysis) with effective connections among them | Connections were made among aspects of the presentation | Presentation of information occurred in unconnected chunks | Some disorganization | Presentation was confusing |
| Ability to field questions | Most group members seemed capable and willing to answer questions | Some group members answered questions, and most answers seemed thoughtful | Group members attempted to answer questions or one group member answered | The group seemed to have some difficulty answering questions | No questions answered |
| Equal distribution of responsibility | In the presentation and preparation, all group members took equal responsibility | In the presentation and preparation, everyone did something, but some took more responsibility than others | Some group members didn't participate in preparation or presentation | The group allowed one person to do everything | Few group members made an effort |