|
|||
|
Please read Instructor Comments before reading this essay. Model #3 A Gradual Bloomer
The earliest memory I have of learning to write
is from the seventh grade. Our class was making a book full of stories
that each of us had written. I wrote a story entitled "Do Unto
Others" about an ungrateful mouse that was killed by a lightening
bolt after being unkind to another animal that had showed him kindness.
When I turned my story in, the teacher simply added it to our "storybook"
without correction or opportunity for revision. However, at that time
in my life I didnt really care about writing; therefore, I was
happy that we didnt have to "mess" with our papers again. The next memories I have of writing are from
high school. Again, it was the same old method: the teacher would return
my paper with all of my mistakes marked (usually punctuation and spelling)
with no chance for revisionin other words, there was a lot of
emphasis on correctness, and none on the global issues like thesis,
body, organization, and so on. I vividly remember a period of two weeks
my junior year when we were given several assignments to write poems.
I wrote a poem called "tear" (the kind you cry). It was one
of the first heart-felt pieces of writing I had ever produced. In it,
I contemplated the ways I saw my girlfriends love for her father
the night her took his own life. Yet again, as always, my teacher returned
our poemsthis time she didnt even write marks on itand
I just stuffed it into my backpack and forgot about it. I didnt
have a real interest in writing, and my teachers lack of interest
failed to pull me from the mire of disinterest. After I graduated from high school, I served
two years in the Army and then began to attend a community college.
While attending, I was exposed to some beginning writing courses. During
that time, I naturally developed a process "sort of" approach
to writing: I would freewrite, then look back over my paper and make
changes as I saw necessary. Yet the depth of instruction that I was
receiving did not take me much further than I had been before. The main
lesson I learned during that time was that a good college paper includes
an introduction, body, and conclusion. Beyond that, I made little progress,
and I was still a mediocre writer at best with a long way to go. After my time at community college, I took a
short sabbatical from school then transferred to Eastern Oregon University.
It was soon after I began attending EOU that things began to change.
My professors made me write more than I ever had, and they would often
encourage revision of our papers, thus introducing me to a new aspect
of writingone which involved a process. I began to learn that
most, if no all, good writing was produced through a process of revisions.
That is, a writer works in a more circular mannermaking changes
along the way, starting over with a new thesis if a better idea comes
to mind, rearranging paragraphs for better organization, developing
an idea further after he or she rereads the paper and notices a lack
of content, and so on. I had an opportunity to see writing done as
a process first hand my first year at EOU. My professor assigned a paper
in which I had to write a fictional story. I decided to write a slightly
changed version of an experience I had during Desert Storm. In my story,
I describe an incident in which two soldiers have an argument resulting
in the larger one threatening the smaller one with physical violence.
Rather than wait for the larger one to act, the smaller one decides
to try to kill him by putting a poisonous scorpion in his boot. Yet
before he has a chance, the two become friends and the smaller soldier
abandons his plan. After we had completed our assignments, my professor
first had us exchange our papers amongst our peers for advice. Next,
we handed in our papers, then a couple of days later they were returned
to us with suggestions for revisions. We were given a couple more days
to make these and other revisions before we handed our papers back in.
I have found this process approach to be a common technique at EOU,
and have since learned other techniques that I can use while writing,
such as idea generating techniques like brainstorming and clustering,
and heuristic approaches like the Pentad. I believe my newfound interest in, and deepening understanding of writing will greatly improve not only the work I do in school, but also the work I do in the future as a teacher (and author?) Though it has taken several years for me to bloom as a writer, I have (Lord willing) a lot of years ahead of me to use the skills that have taken so long to mature within me. I am looking forward to learning more about writing during the remaining time I have at Eastern and am taking full advantage of the resources that it affords me. |
|||
|
Site Maintained by the Eastern Oregon University Writing Lab Problems viewing our site? Contact Susan Whitelock susan.whitelock@eou.edu |
|||