|
Welfare reform seeks
to:
- reduce out-of-wedlock
pregnancies
- under what assumption(s)?) Check out teen pregnancy rates over time (page 1)--what was happening by 1996, when PRWORA was passed?
- federal funds
to support 'abstinence-only' education
- Reproductive independence--who gets it?
- Welfare benefit levels and fertility decisions--like sushi and homework?
- Crack down
on 'predatory men,' statutory rape
- Institute
the 'family cap'--children who
'don't count'
- The Illegitimacy,
anti-abortion bonus sweepstakes--five states with the greatest
reductions in out-of-wedlock births got bonus money from the federal
government, if done without raising the abortion rate
- The catch--no extra money for disseminating information on birth
control.
- promote marriage
as a route off of welfare
- increase in welfare spending
- US population growth
- US defense spending
- US corn production
- US marriage and divorce
- Oklahome marriage and birth statistics (top of page 15 has state totals--Oklahoma was a prime beneficiary of marriage promotion federal funding during the Bush/Cheney Administration)
- Allow children
to be 'cared for at home.' Let's look at some of the childcare
rules:
- Childcare
subsidy-more expensive to put them in care than
to care for them at home
- Most
women receive no childcare subsidies (on TANF)-waiting
lists, lack of certified providers
- Onerous
application process: letter from employer, certification
of eligibility and compliance from caseworker, physical exams
and immunizations, medical records of kids, reporting requirements-failure
to comply ends any subsidy
- Poor
mothers are less likely to have friends/relatives who are
certified-why?
- What
happens? Why are only half of eligible mothers receiving child
care benefits in many states?
- Mothers
are unaware
- Many
never complete the initial application process
- They
can't keep up with reporting requirements
- It's
too difficult to manage childcare slots as required
- What
about caseworkers? What do their jobs end up looking like?
- As in
many instances with welfare reform, the rules themselves may
not be overly burdensome, but it is their rigidity--there are no exceptions (e.g., the abused and traumatized child
example)
- Issues:
-
Suspect quality of childcare
- Graveyard
shifts?? Swing shifts?
- 'deadbeat
dads': collecting child support is difficult, expensive
- the
problems? Poverty, domestic violence, paternity,
locating fathers
- enforcement costs vs payments received
- Who's being held accountable here?
- Most of the money goes to the state to cover
costs of enforcing the program
- This
makes it difficult for mothers to maintain family
ties-In essence, it works against functioning families, in many cases, and can bring violent men back into women's
lives.
- Family
values, or cost recovery
Choices--to get married, remain single .... issues with marriageability of men
Encouraging family values, or enforcing social control of mothers?
|