| Descriptions
of assignments
Grading
procedures
| Assignment |
tentative
due date
|
points
possible |
|
Monday
in class, week 5
|
100
pts |
|
end
of week 4 (we'll do presentations Thu and Fri)
|
100
pts |
|
throughout
|
100
pts |
|
presentation
during week 10, paper due finals week
|
200
pts |
| totals |
|
500
pts
|
Grading
procedures
'The
A students get hired by the B students, who end up working for the C
students.' Al McGuire
I will grade on
a straight percentage:
| 90
- 100% |
A |
Minuses will be given for the bottom third (0-3)
of each range; pluses for the top third (7-9). I will also use
pluses and minuses to help if I feel that one's grade did not
reflect his/her effort; I will not use them to reduce a grade. |
|
80
- 89%
|
B |
| 70-79% |
C |
| 60-69% |
D |
| <
60% |
F |
top
of page
Assignment
descriptions
Mid-term exam
This
will be a take-home exam. I will give it to you on Thursday of week
4, and you'll need to turn it in by the beginning of class on Monday
(week 5).
The mid-term
is worth 100 points.
top
of page
Homelessness
project
There are two points
to the homelessness project. The first is to understand the problem--it's
one of those invisible problems, especially in a place like La Grande,
and although it may not be as pervasive as other problems, there are
likely huge gaps in coverage to address it (and many of the people affected
are likely children). In addition, we're reading Wagner's book, which
just happens to be an excellent social science look at the subculture
of a 'homeless' community. Second, in studying homelessness, particularly
its local dimensions, you'll have to educate yourselves about various
aspects of the local welfare system, the private, public and non-profit,
as well as the other individuals and institutions not generally associated
with welfare (e.g., what role do restaurants play in feeding people
with no place to go and no money to eat?). So it's a bonus, you see--you
get the content, and the process, all rolled into one! Here's
what I've got from our discussions this week:
1. Journal
This will be turned
in by each individual. It should include observations you've made, as
well as documentation and analysis of those observations, whether they
be of group dynamics--dysfunctional and otherwise (sociological insight
often comes from the most unexpected places, and some of the most uncomfortable
events are the most indelibly etched ...)--or actual observations having
to do with people you interview, the process of information-gathering
about this, particular institutions or offices you've interacted with
(e.g., law enforcement, the schools), difficulties of gaining access,
getting by gatekeepers, etc. Not all of the insights will reflect success
stories, but they should all reflect learning of some sort. This is
how you'll be held accountable for your level of effort, and I'll compare
it to what you said you'd do in the next section.
2. Goal statements
You should have
this to me by midweek, preferably sooner. Here are some things you should
lay out:
- State goals and
objectives (objectives are more explicit, goals can be general; often
for each goal there are a couple of objectives, ways of reaching it);
- Division of labor
among group members--be explicit;
- Method (what
are the steps for addressing your objectives? You should be pretty
complete here--this is your road map, include everything--identifying
appropriate contacts, finding contact numbers, making contacts, etc.
(you can skip meals and bathroom breaks, though).
- Each group
member needs to work on the methods part for him/herself--again,
I'm looking for thoughtfulness and detail here--have you thought
all of this through, and do you have a set of things against which
you can measure yourself in a couple of weeks?
- Transcribed,
summarized, reflection on how well you met the goals
- 75 points possible
on this part of the assignment (40 for the journal, 35 for reflection,
which is your response to your goals statement)
3. Group presentation
- 20 minutes maximum
for each group (we have five groups);
- grading criteria:
- Relevance
(did you address your stated goals? How well? If not, did you
discuss why?)
- Importance
(did you convey the most important points of what your group did?)
- broad participation
(did each member play a meaningful part in the presentation?)
- 1-2 page
distillation, one turned in for the entire group (how well did
you incorporate each members' contributions?)
- 25 points
(15 for the presentation, 10 for the summary)
KEEP IN MIND:
The take-home exam will be a reflection of your work on this project,
and on the Wagner book and our discussions of the topic of homelessness.
If you put the effort into the journal and the analysis sections, you
will likely benefit when it comes time to do the take-home exam.
Haven
from Hunger
We will spend the
last six weeks of the course working on and presenting our work on the
Haven from Hunger project. That should give you an idea of the importance
I'll attach to it, and it reflects the 200 points possible--40% of your
overall point total. We will use this time not only to work on various
projects and build Haven from Hunger from the bottom up, but to examine
some of the relationships between local hunger and social welfare. Most
of the readings will be about social capital and the community, and
I will expect that each of your groups and as individuals you will begin
to incorporate some of the important concepts and insights we read about
into what you're doing in your projects, and into your presentation
and papers. Most of this work will be undertaken in small groups. As
with the homelessness project, we will focus on a specific subject area,
but you will be learning about how various organizations and individuals
in town address the problem (i.e., how it fits in to the local welfare
system), and where La Grande stands vis a vis the rest of the state,
nation, etc.
Group project
The projects may
vary widely, and we'll discuss the possibilities later in the term.
What follows are some of the things that will be important for evaluation:
A plan:
- Statement of
goals (goals can be general, objectives represent more specific ways
to achieve them, and methods show how)
- Are they
thoughtful (did you obviously put some effort into them)?
- Are they
achievable/feasible?
- Do they reflect
the broader Haven from Hunger project goals (how do they fit in
with the broader project)?
- Objectives
- For instance,
if your goal was to conduct a non-food item drive, objectives
would describe how-door-to-door, from storefronts, on-campus,
etc.
- Methods
- What specific
steps must you take in order to meet your objectives (identify
important contact, how you'll contact them, what role they'll
play, where goods will be stored, how you'll handle transport,
whether you'll accept donations and how you'll handle them, etc.
the methods section is the most detailed, and it is where you
can begin dividing tasks among group members.
Points?
- group vs individual
- the plan
needs to include not only how the group has decided to divide
labor, but how each individual plans to undertake his/her part
of the overall project.
- 25 points
possible for the plan. 15 for the groups' part, and 10 for each
individual's description of what he/she will do.
Analysis and
reflection paper
- No longer than
10 pages, double-spaced. I'll look to see that you addressed what
you said you would do (that doesn't mean you can't change, but you'll
need to explain it if you did).
- Include a brief
abstract (what you set out to do, findings), as well as any data you
collected (you can include this stuff as appendices, send it to me
electronically, etc.)
- I'll look for:
- evidence
of effort on the part of each group member--I will match what
each group member said he/she would do with the write-up of your
group's activities in the final paper. It would be good to keep
some sort of journal as you go through this--remember there is
a reflection piece as part of the participation grade.
- thoughtfulness
in your analysis
- integration--how
does what you did fit within the Haven from Hunger project and
the local welfare system?
- 75 points
possible for the reflection paper; 50 for the group effort, 25
for the individual contributions evidenced in the report.
Presentations
(what form should they take, how should they be evaluated?)
- relevance
(to what you've done, to what we've covered in the course); 10 points
- importance
(did you hit the highlights?); 10 points
- participation
(was everyone involved in meaningful ways?); 10 points
- media used
(something besides talking heads behind a podium. Be creative, I will
help any way I can, but don't go crazy here spending weeks working
on a web/powerpoint presentation). 5 points
- summary
(a 1-2 page distillation of what your group did, how it went, and
what you learned); 15 points
- 50 points
altogether
Two in-class
small group discussions
- I'll provide
details as we go. We'll likely incorporate the hunger project and
reading material for these.
50 points
possible--25 for each.
Checksheet
This should help
you with some of the pieces of the project:
Project goals:
- Raising awareness
- Building social
capital
- More complete
knowledge of the local problems
- Alleviate hunger
and food insecurity
Labor:
- estimates of
labor costs
- hrs of labor,
specific tasks, resources needs, such as a vehicle
- sources? Have
you made any contacts to get these on a regular basis?
Materials:
- ANY materials,
supplies-this is important not to forget
- we need estimates
if we're going to get money;
- ongoing sources
of money (you at least should identify best bets, and whether you've
talked to anyone)
- sustainability-are
these costs the same over time? Will they go up/down if the project
is done on a regular basis?
Social capital:
- groups/individuals/organizations
- info about the
organization (mission, size, etc.), contact information, gatekeepers,
etc.
- what is their
contribution to the sustainability of the project-in other words,
prioritize these based on which are most important to the success
of the project
- self-interest-why
are they involved?
- Maintenance-what
needs to be done to keep them involved? This also gets at interest
level (and some might be more interested than others within a group/organization)
Barriers:
- Individuals who
don't support the project
- 'weak links'
in the social capital network (e.g., Salvation Army as a food bank,
WalMart as a good community neighbor)
- difficulties
securing labor, materials, etc.
§ lack of continuity (that could reduce external support for
the project)
- logistical issues
(e.g., health dept. regulations, difficulties securing space for events)
- try to come up
with some ways that these barriers can be addressed
- Remember we talked
about different kinds of 'biases' that prevent people from participating?
Awareness-raising:
- if you have an
event, what strategy(ies) will you suggest to publicize it, and why?
- If your event
is mostly about awareness-raising, how will it work to raise awareness,
and how will you know it was effective?
Evaluating success
- What measures
will let you know if your efforts have had an impact (e.g., how to
measure food/other items collected, what information to collect about
an event)?
top of page
Class participation
Because of the nature
of this class, I will be taking attendance. Each day of class is worth
one point. You get one unexcused, two excused absences. 'Participation'
can mean facilitating or getting others to contribute, offering original
ideas, displaying your knowledge and preparation, showing that you can
think critically about course materials, etc. I may on occasion ask
you at the end of a week (Thursday or Friday) to respond to a question
I give you in class. This isn't a pop quiz-there are no points per se,
but I will incorporate these into my evaluation of your participation
(so if you're not there for them, it will likely affect your participation
grade). Thirty points will come in the form of a reflection paper I'll
ask you to write at the end of the term, reflecting on the course and
the small group dynamics. If you take notes as you go, this will be
a much easier task when you get around to doing it. The last 20 points
will come from a couple of reflection papers at the end of class time
I'll ask you to write. I'll be looking to see that you're not only engaged
in the practical activities, but that you're following along in the
readings and able to incorporate them into what we're doing in class.
Each will be worth 10 points, and I'll probably do this three times
(you can throw out your lowest score).
Here’s the way points will break down for participation:
- 30 points will come in the form of a reflection paper I'll ask you to write at the end of the term, reflecting on the small group activities. I’ll give you some material during the term to help with this, and we’ll discuss it in class from time to time.
- 15 points will come from a journal documenting your small group activities, which you’ll turn in with your paper (and which, if done well, should form the basis for your paper), at the end of the ninth week.
- 40 points for attendance. We will take roll every day. I’ll throw out one day for every week of the term, but you won’t know which day (and neither do I, yet).
- 15 points are possible for general participation in classroom activity—this means making your presence known, asking questions, interacting in small groups, essentially making a valuable contribution to the quality of the class experience.
100 points are
possible for participation.
|