PHIL 102

Ethics, Politics, & Law

Fall Quarter 2004

Dr. Jeff Johnson

James Rachels	Judith DeCew	Ronald Dworkin

This quarter in Ethics, Politics, & Law we will examine four important issues in contemporary moral philosophy and American law.  The first is as ancient as western philosophy -- the nature of moral truth and knowledge.  The second is much more recent in both moral philosophy and law -- the nature of personal and legal privacy.  The third is the continuing constitutional question of Equal Protection.  And finally, the fourth is on-going controversy regarding abortion.

It should be obvious that all of these issues are not merely controversial, but occasionally bring out deep passions.  We will make no attempt to definitively settle any of these questions, but we can hope to gain a better understanding of their subtleties.  My hope is that you will discover the value in carefully considering reasoned arguments, including some that you will almost certainly disagree with, and formulating you own reasoned responses to them.

There will be a number of "texts" for this course.  We will be reading the better part of three excellent short books:

The Elements of Moral Philosophy by James Rachels

In Pursuit of Privacy by Judith DeCew

Life's Dominion by Ronald Dworkin

We will also read two of my own professional articles.  Finally we will be utilizing contemporary cinema as a different sort of text for raising moral and legal questions.  Every Wednesday evening at 6:00 we will be showing a movie related to our readings and discussions.  Students are required to see at least six of the nine films we will be showing.

UWR Writing Intensive Outcomes:

• Students will produce at least 3,000 words (including drafts, in-class writing, informal papers, and polished papers); 1,000 words of this total should be in polished papers which students have revised after receiving feedback and criticism.

• Students will be introduced to the discourse forms appropriate to the discipline the course represents.

• Students will write at least one paper integrating information from at least one source, employing the appropriate documentation style for the discipline represented by the course.

• Students will draft, revise, and edit their formal written work.
  Students will seek assistance from a Writing Tutor in the Writing Lab when needed and when referred by the instructor.

Additional Outcomes:

• Understand the philosophical and legal controversies concerning moral truth, personal privacy, Equal Protection, and abortion.

• Read philosophical texts critically and with understanding.

• Critically view cinema dealing with social issues.

• Write effectively about philosophical and legal controversies.

• Write effectively about social issues in contemporary cinema

Means of Assessment and Grading:

• An in-class mid-term essay exam -- 30% of course grade. (outcomes 1, 2, & 4)

• An in-class final essay exam -- 30% of course grade. (outcomes 1, 2, and 4)

• A 1000 to 1500 words analytical paper explaining and assessing a moral/legal controversy -- 30% of course grade. (outcomes 1, 2, and 4)

• A portofolio of six short (300 to 400 words) on assigned movies -- 10% of course grade. (outcomes 3 and 5)

• Please note: a grade of C- is required in order for this course to count toward the University Writing Requirement 

ACADEMIC HONESTY

I am including below Eastern's Academic Honesty Code.  It is vitally important that you carefully read it, and that you understand that it is my intention to follow this code to the letter.  I really can't think of a better way to ruin your experience with this course, than to disregard this code.  Obviously, if you have any questions, I can't urge you too strongly to ask me.

ACADEMIC HONESTY CODE

All members of the Eastern Oregon University academic community are responsible for compliance with its Academic Honesty Code. Students are required to report violations to the respective faculty member of a course. Provisions of the Academic Honesty Code are:

1. Collaboration while taking any quizzes, in-class examinations, or take home examinations without the instructor's written approval is forbidden. The faculty member is responsible for defining limits for other collaborative learning activities for each course.

2. Plagiarism or representation of the work of others as one's own is forbidden. The faculty member will make clear the format for properly citing sources of information not original by the student.

3. Explicit approval by all instructors is required if the same work is to be submitted to more than one course, even if is not within the same term.

Violations of the Academic Honesty Code may result in both academic and behavioral penalties including possible suspension or expulsion from the University.

An automatic grade of zero for any work which is a violation of the Academic Honesty Code will be assigned by the instructor. The instructor may also assign a grade of F for the course after discussion with the respective School Dean. Students may appeal the course grade to the respective School Dean, who is the final level of appeal on the matter of course grade penalties for academic dishonesty.

The faculty member is also required to file a disciplinary complaint to the Vice President for Student Affairs about any student believed to have violated the Academic Honesty Code. If deemed appropriate, hearing procedures will be implemented by a University Hearing Officer as outlined in the Code of Student Conduct. Possible sanctions considered by the Student Conduct Committee include probation, suspension, and expulsion.

TENTATIVE CALENDAR