![]() |
|
|
Soc
315: Social Welfare
|
|
|
Number of credits: 5 Instructor: Bill Grigsby Course time(s): every fall term, at either 9 or 10 am General Education: Does not fulfill gen-ed requirements Catalog description: Analysis of the concept of social welfare including an introduction to the nature of government and voluntary programs and the services provided by them, as well as their theory, principles, and methods. Prerequisites: None, but Soc 204 or 205 is recommended, and college level reading and writing ability is expected. Website: www.eou.edu/socwelf Most recent syllabus: Fall 2007 Recent textbooks used:
General topics covered: history of welfare; inequality and poverty; welfare theory; low-wage work; family; social insurance programs; stigmatization of the poor; means-tested programs; private/non-profit/public welfare; corporate welfare Course objectives 1. be exposed to the
historical context of social welfare in the United States. Social welfare can
be broadly defined as social intervention designed to enhance or maintain
human welfare. That's pretty broad, and could include things like police
and fire services (in fact multinational energy companies might say they're
in the welfare business with that sort of eligibility requirement). Most
of the time we limit this to interventions designed to improve the lives
or situations of the distressed and the disadvantaged. You can probably
think of various populations that would meet these requirements-people
and families falling below the poverty line, victims of natural disasters,
refugees seeking asylum from political persecution, migrant farm workers,
disabled persons, the elderly, parolees from corrections, the unemployed,
people without housing, children who've been removed from their homes,
AIDS patients, victims of sexual assault, etc. For each of these groups
of people, there may be public, private or non-profit resources, agencies
or programs available to help meet their needs. Social welfare is also
a politically charged arena, especially in the U.S. where many believe
that people are responsible for their own circumstances in life, and government
shouldn't be in the business of 'providing handouts.' A more structural
argument contends that many people are in fact the victims-whether intended
or unintended-of unresponsive, distorted or underfunded government policies
that reflect the power of wealth, elite groups and corporations with greater
political influence over decision makers, who are often far removed from
the harsh realities of people living below the poverty line. Consider:
government budgets are generally growing faster than people's incomes.
Conservatives use this as a rallying cry for reducing the size of government;
liberals will say 'do you think it's a coincidence?' |