TEACHING EVALUATION
Characteristics to be Evaluated
Exemplary teaching is complex, creative, and intellectually challenging. Drawing upon summaries of prior research, Eastern has identified eight broad characteristics
of instruction that are to be evaluated:
- Good organization of subject matter and course
- Effective communication
- Knowledge of and enthusiasm for the subject matter and teaching
- Positive attitudes toward students
- Fairness in examinations and grading
- Flexibility in approaches to teaching
- Appropriate student learning outcomes
- Effectiveness in advising
Course Reaction Surveys
Faculty are to obtain student evaluations in all courses with enrollments of
3 or more and to do so all terms. Courses taught "in-load" and "out-of-load"
are included as are campus-based and off-campus courses, using the University's
approved forms and procedures developed
for residential and for extended courses. Faculty may choose to supplement these
forms with other ways to obtain student evaluations of instruction but these
efforts would be supplements and not substitutes.
Each term, the overall student evaluation data will be tabulated with campus-wide norms being reported to faculty when they receive their individual reports. This
provides a comparative frame of reference for interpreting student evaluation results.
Faculty around the country differ on the extent to which they view course reaction surveys as actual measures of teaching effectiveness or as simply measures of
student satisfaction. What is certain is that such surveys will, by default, carry more weight than, perhaps, they should if additional means of assessing teaching are not
used. Eastern does require varied and complementary means of systematically evaluating teaching; the remainder of this Handbook section presents those means.
The Teaching Portfolio
All Instructional faculty undergoing personnel evaluation reviews (tenure; promotion; third- and fifth-year reviews; continuation; and full post-tenure reviews) will
assemble a portfolio that is a collection of material depicting the nature and quality of an individual's teaching and students' learning. Faculty will assemble
systematically collected data from a number of sources so that their teaching can be evaluated fairly and given the emphasis it requires. This portfolio must be modest
in size and limited to information that is relevant and current. The following materials are to be included in the portfolio to document performance in teaching and
advising.
- Framing Statement -- Faculty provide a "framing statement" indicating
the individual's teaching roles and responsibilities along with a reflective
statement focusing on teaching philosophy, important educational outcomes,
instructional strategies, activities engaged in to improve teaching, and future
goals. This statement creates the conceptual framework that will help members
of personnel committees to understand diverse faculty intentions, goals and
teaching practices. Faculty diversity in approaches to the instructional mission
will be respected; but this can only been done to the extent that the Framing
Statement provides an internally coherent and complete articulation of the
faculty member's pedagogical assumptions and approaches. The intent is to
evaluate faculty within the context of their unique approach taken to teaching
and goals pursued, which can vary widely depending on individual temperament
and the demands of their discipline.
- Student Evaluations -- Student evaluations for all courses taught
with enrollments of more than three in the most recent two years, including
courses taught in load and out-of-load, will be included in the portfolio.
At a minimum, Eastern's standard student evaluation form and standard evaluation
procedures are to be used for each course; faculty may elect to supplement
these evaluations with approaches of their own design.
- Course Syllabi -- Faculty will include three representative course
syllabi from those taught in the past two years, including lower and upper
division or graduate courses.
- Academic Advising -- The portfolio will include evidence that faculty
members make valuable contributions in the area of student advising. Data
on advising caseloads will be reported on a term-by-term basis for the past
two years. When the Advising Coordinator has developed a system for evaluating
each advisor's ability and effectiveness, the results of these assessments
are to be included in the portfolio.
- Institutional Records and Descriptive Information -- Faculty are
to assemble the following institutional records and descriptive information:
- List of classes taught, course delivery mode (on campus, Weekend University,
Ed-Net, etc.), and enrollment numbers in the past two years
- Grade distributions in all classes taught in the past two years
- Service on capstone committees, both in the capacity of advisor and/or
reader
- Curriculum development activities either at the program or University-wide
level
- Programs, summaries of field trips, other experiences used to broaden
students' knowledge beyond the classroom context
- Optional items -- Faculty members' inclusion of optional items is strictly
limited to those that will represent a picture of some significant aspect
of their teaching that is not revealed in the required portfolio items.
Promotion and Tenure Reviews
In addition to maintaining a Teaching Portfolio as specified in the preceding section, faculty being considered for promotion and/or tenure shall be observed and peer-evaluated directly in the classroom and have personnel committee interviews of select
ed alumni who have taken courses from the professor.
- The direct classroom observations will take place in the year prior to
the promotion or tenure decision. At a minimum, two unannounced classroom
visits are to be made by three different individuals: the School Dean, a faculty
peer selected by the person being evaluated, and a faculty peer selected by
the School Dean.
The following standardized items are to be used to guide classroom observations.
The report of each peer reviewer should address each of the items.
- COMMUNICATION SKILLS AS OBSERVED
- Projected voice to be heard easily
- Listened to student questions and comments
- Presented examples to clarify points
- Commanded attention
- WHAT WERE THE MOST AND LEAST HELPFUL THINGS THE INSTRUCTOR DID TO COMMUNICATE
EFFECTIVELY?
- KNOWLEDGE OF AND ENTHUSIASM FOR SUBJECT MATTER AND FOR TEACHING
- Presented material appropriate to the stated purpose of the lesson
- Demonstrated command of the subject matter
- Encouraged student involvement
- WHAT CONTENT APPEARED TO BE THE MOST AND THE LEAST SUITABLE TO THE
LESSON?
- ATTITUDES TOWARD THE STUDENTS
- Encouraged student discussion
- Encouraged students to answer difficult questions
- Used questions to determine if students were having difficulty
- HOW DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW INTEREST IN STUDENTS AND THEIR LEARNING?
- COMMENTS ON OVERALL TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS
The individual reports of peer reviewers are available to the faculty
member being reviewed and are to be included in the promotion and/or
tenure dossier being reviewed by personnel committees, the dean, the
provost, and the president.
- Alumni will be interviewed either face-to-face or via telephone. The following
set of standardized questions are to be utilized to focus the interview.
- What is your overall assessment of Professor X in terms of:
- course organization?
- communication skills?
- enthusiasm?
- rapport with students?
- effectiveness of the class?
- grading practices?
- How would you describe your working relationship with Professor X?
- How satisfied are you with the education you received in Professor
X's classes?
- How would you compare Professor X with other teachers in the same area?
- How would you compare Professor X with other teachers in other areas?
- Did you ever recommend Professor X's courses to other students?
The faculty being evaluated will provide a list of eight graduates who
have taken at least two courses from them. School Personnel Committee members
will interview at least three alumni from this list.
The individual reports of the alumni interviews are to be included in the
promotion and/or tenure dossier being reviewed by personnel committees,
the dean, the provost, and the president.
- Faculty being reviewed for promotion or tenure will include in their portfolios
copies of all previous personnel review recommendations made during their
career at Eastern (School Personnel Committee recommendations, Assembly Personnel
Committee recommendations, School Dean's recommendations, Provost recommendations,
and the President's recommendations).
School Procedures
Schools are encouraged to develop supplemental procedures. For example,
a professional program may wish to invite practicing professionals to offer
comment on course syllabi; other programs might wish to systematically survey
majors and include questions about instructional and advising quality as
well as about instructors and advisors.
Schools may also seek to change or perfect components of the University
policy. For example, a School may find that a particular approach to peer
evaluation or to the questions asked of alumni is better suited to the situation
and objectives of the School. Development of improved and tailored approaches
is encouraged; however, any departures from or amendments to the University
policy must be approved by the School faculty, the School Dean, and the
Provost prior to implementation. Some changes are likely to be minor: e.g.,
the wording of questions asked of alumni. If, however, the Provost judges
the School policy to depart from the principles and high expectations set
by University policy, then she/he will require Assembly approval before
acting on the proposal. Such approved school-level modifications will be
noted in this section of the Faculty/Staff Handbook. So far, none
have been proposed or approved, and the preceding University policy on Evaluation
of Teaching applies to all teaching faculty undergoing personnel reviews.
[Responsible for Accuracy: John S. Miller, Provost - Last Verified: 7/28/00]
From Faculty/Staff Handbook